If a 401(k) plan fails ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing, common corrective steps include:

Prepare for the CEBS Course 3 Exam with Group Benefits Associate and Retirement Plans Associate content using flashcards and multiple choice questions. Enhance your understanding with hints and explanations for each question, ensuring you're ready for success!

Multiple Choice

If a 401(k) plan fails ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing, common corrective steps include:

Explanation:
Nondiscrimination testing for 401(k) plans looks at how much highly compensated employees defer and contribute compared with nonhighly compensated employees. When the plan fails the ADP/ACP tests, the standard corrective steps are to remove the imbalance by returning any excess deferrals, then reallocate those amounts to non-highly compensated employees, or to change the plan design to a safe harbor. Returning excess contributions and shifting deferrals toward NHCEs directly adjusts the percentages so the plan meets the nondiscrimination requirements, and adopting a safe harbor design guarantees future contributions that satisfy the tests automatically, avoiding penalties. The other options don’t fix the testing issue in the same way. Simply increasing employer matching across the board isn’t a recognized corrective step for an ADP/ACP failure unless it’s implemented as a safe harbor design, and even then it’s part of a design change rather than a post-failure correction. Terminating the plan retroactively isn’t a valid corrective action for nondiscrimination testing, and excluding highly compensated employees from future contributions would violate the nondiscrimination rules.

Nondiscrimination testing for 401(k) plans looks at how much highly compensated employees defer and contribute compared with nonhighly compensated employees. When the plan fails the ADP/ACP tests, the standard corrective steps are to remove the imbalance by returning any excess deferrals, then reallocate those amounts to non-highly compensated employees, or to change the plan design to a safe harbor. Returning excess contributions and shifting deferrals toward NHCEs directly adjusts the percentages so the plan meets the nondiscrimination requirements, and adopting a safe harbor design guarantees future contributions that satisfy the tests automatically, avoiding penalties.

The other options don’t fix the testing issue in the same way. Simply increasing employer matching across the board isn’t a recognized corrective step for an ADP/ACP failure unless it’s implemented as a safe harbor design, and even then it’s part of a design change rather than a post-failure correction. Terminating the plan retroactively isn’t a valid corrective action for nondiscrimination testing, and excluding highly compensated employees from future contributions would violate the nondiscrimination rules.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy